When Biafra Ceased to Exist: Archived Video Shows Major-General Philip Effiong Concedes the War

“That we accept the existing administrative and political structure of the Federation of Nigeria, that any future constitutional arrangement will be worked out by representatives of the people of Nigeria. That the Republic of Biafra hereby ceases to exist.”

By Anthony Obi Ogbo (Texas International Guardian)

The basic philosophy of progress hinges on reconciliation of the past with the present to forge a prolific future. While the issue about Nigeria’s restructuring or regional partition rages, it might be appropriate to update the current population about documented facts about the previous civil war in connection with the struggle of the Igbo’s for self-resurgence; and how it sadly ended.

It was on January 15 few days after the surrender at Dondan Barracks in Lagos, in the presence of General Gowon, below is Biafra’s second-in-command, Major-General Philip Effiong conceding the war, and announcing the end of the Biafra.

Biafra’s Concession Speech  – from Effiong to Gowon

“I, Major-General Philip Effiong, Officer Administrating the Government of the Republic of Biafra, now wish to make the following declaration: that we affirm that we are loyal Nigerian citizens and accept the authority of the Federal Military Government of Nigeria. That we accept the existing administrative and political structure of the Federation of Nigeria, that any future constitutional arrangement will be worked out by representatives of the people of Nigeria. That the Republic of Biafra hereby ceases to exist.

The situation seem hopeless and prolonging the conflict would have only led to further destruction and starvation of the people of Biafra so Effiong believed. “I am convinced now that a stop must be put to the bloodshed which is going on as a result of war. I am also convinced that the suffering of our people must be brought to an immediate end”

The term “Biafra” is psychologically relevant to every person who hails from a region once declared as Biafra. Yet it must be noted that political and historical relevance of this this struggle has never been disputed, and in fact remains indelible in the global history of human struggle for existence.  

This may be hard to swallow, but must be noted that the current contention about Biafra has nothing whatsoever to do with a collective struggle of the Igbos.  Pro-Biafara groups do not represent the Igbos but individually represents specific missions which most of them have totally failed to properly convey.

Noted one Dr. Ugoji Egbujo in an article published in the Nigerian Vanguard, “Biafra was justice and freedom. But Biafra has become a tool for charlatans, a toy for dissipation of youthful exuberance. Biafra once evoked Igbo unity and enterprise. But Biafra has now been appropriated by jobless opportunists who exploit the frustrations of their poor brothers. Biafra was Igbo fellowship. But this their new Biafra thrives on cannibalizing fellow Igbos. Biafra was consultation, consensus. This Biafra is now extremism, hallucination, egocentrism.”

It is evident that the current controversy about Biafra – to be or not to be – has nothing to do with identity of the Igbos as Biafrans. Being a Biafran is not a choice; for every person who hails from a region once declared as Biafra is a Biafran. However, we must note that the only major contention is a total resistance to charlatans and ill-informed extremists using Biafra and the most respected Igbo values to aimlessly and unintelligibly pursue selfish interests. 

♦ Publisher, Anthony Obi Ogbo, PhD is the founder of the American Journal of Transformational Leadership

The Intimidation of the Igbos – Nigeria cannot militarize a majority ethnic group

Often, the major tests of courage is not to die, but to live.  To all loving IGBOS around the world, we cannot afford to be slaves in our fathers land, neither can we afford to be intimidated into submission. Reform must come from within, not from strangers. We are not minorities.  We are a majority ethnic group and MUST demand and (not ask) for our unchallengeable rights as a full citizens of this nation.   

By Dominic (Big-D) Ikeogu

As usual, offering my little opinion to matters about Nigeria government and governing is my rights of social involvement, and I will not stop exercising that cause. With the crisis going on in the Eastern Nigeria,  we as Igbo’s and indeed other Nigerians must step up with a demand for explanations to those we elected, and probe their level of representation.

Starting with the South East, the Igbo elected leaders; from  governors, senators, to the congress should demand  immediate answers from President Muhammadu Buhari and his federal government on the real objective of  this military exercise. Was there any imminent danger or threat to public safety that justified the latest intimidation and provocations to the Igbos? Perhaps, one would rightly think that was a retaliatory measure; to chastise a region opposed to the schismatic nature of Nigeria’s structure.  If we are seriously practicing democracy, our elected leaders should demand an inquiry and a hearing on why this operation was needed.  

It might be right to think that the undisciplined soldiers that carried out the raids in South East had mandatory orders  from “above” to indiscriminately eliminate certain citizens for protesting their concerns.  Obviously, there is no justification to intimidate Nnamdi Kanu and his group, the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) movement. With these disturbing events, my question again would be; with fierce looking solders invading his property, does Kanu have a right of self-defense? Another troubling puzzle is that these Army vandals could plant weapons inside Kanu’s property just to gather enough excuse to subdue his crusade.

The Buhari’s government remains a democratic entity, where Mr. President is answerable to the people. It is illegal and against any democratic standards to order military operations to  unarmed and defenseless children; especially where the President has a duty to protect those individuals.

I would recommend that those affected by this ordeal should file a class action lawsuit against the President, his government, and his army for illegal raids, violation of their rights, and the massacre of their citizens. In every democratic setting, citizens have a right to protest injustice, and Kanu and IPOB did just that. The entire South-South and South-East should protest from all angles, and march all the major cities of Lagos, Abuja, Onitsha , Aba and Port – Harcourt -on the same day to show solidarity and respect for democracy.

Often, the major tests of courage is not to die, but to live.  To all loving IGBOS around the world, we cannot afford to be slaves in our fathers land, neither can we afford to be intimidated into submission. Reform must come from within, not from strangers. We are not minorities.  We are a majority ethnic group and MUST demand and (not ask) for our unchallengeable rights as  full citizens of this nation.   

♦ BIG D – Dominic Ikeogu resides in Minnesota.

NIGERIA – VIDEO SHOWS ACTIVIST NNAMDI KANU SOLICITING “GUNS AND BULLETS” IN CALIFORNIA

At World Igbo Congress 2015 In Los Angeles Nnamdi Kanu is seen soliciting for support to procure “guns and bullets” to fight his government in Nigeria

Nigerians are currently divided between condemnation of threatening rhetoric of the embattled leader of the Indigenous Peoples of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, and charges of use of excessive force levelled against law enforcement agencies. However, some video clips of the Biafrian activist may be troubling, considering recent crisis in South Eastern Nigeria regarding this issue. This video clearly shows Mr. Kanu addressing the World Igbo Congress 2015 at Los Angeles, openly soliciting support to procure arm (guns and bullets) against his country.

Tropical Storm Harvey – Vietnamese billionaire immigrant donates $5 million to Houston

Vietnamese immigrant and billionaire Kieu Hoang, the founder of California-based Rare Antibody Antigen Supply, has donated $5 million to help Houston recover from Tropical Storm Harvey.

Kieu Hoang, the founder of California-based Rare Antibody Antigen Supply, announced the donation at a Monday news conference with Houston Mayor Sylvester Turner.

HOUSTON – California businessman Kieu Hoang offered Houston Mayor Sylvester Turner a $5 million donation for Harvey flood relief Monday, city officials said.

Mayor Turner accepted the offer from the Vietnamese immigrant who made $1.25 an hour in the first job in the U.S. The donation will go to the Greater Houston Community Fund.

“Mr. Hoang’s stunning generosity to a community far from his home is a beautiful demonstration of the American spirit that inspires us to reach across the miles to help our fellow citizens,” Mayor Turner said in a statement. “The fact that he started his new life in America at a basic level, and rose to prominence in the business world, is also a lesson for Houston as we bounce back from adversity.”

According to Forbes, Hoang founded Rare Antibody Antigen Supply in 1980 and Shanghai RAAS Blood Products in 1992. He bought a winery and vineyards from the Mondavi estate in Napa Valley in 2014 and now operates the Kieu Hoang Winery.

Nigeria and America: Two flood disasters and how their citizens reacted

Photo left: In Nigeria, Benue state – an area with a history of flooding, the storm took the population by surprise, submerging the region with heavy flooding, causing deaths and property-damages. In Houston, Texas (right) for instance, Hurricane Harvey ravaged thousands of victims in just four days, dumping more than 40 inches of rain with thunder, earth-shattering wild wind, and catastrophic flooding.

We must compare the citizens too, on how Americans were in the Social Media delivering safety, and Nigerian masses were on Facebook watching European Soccer.

By Anthony Obi Ogbo

Between Nigeria and the United States, in August, two major flood disasters raged a similar havoc. The storms were not on the same Consequently, in Nigeria, Benue state – an area with a history of flooding, the storm took the population by surprise, submerging the region with heavy flooding, causing deaths and property-damages. Nigeria’s president, Muhammadu Buhari said the flooding displaced more than 100,000 people. Authorities also signaled the possibility of diseases and food scarcity.

As usual, Nigerians in the social media were not happy with their government because, according to the information they shared and tagged around, the United States Vice President visited the disaster areas and helped victims to remove debris, whereas Nigeria’s Vice President visited his flood victims and walked on a red –carpet. In fact, some posts or comments made fun of this moment, comparing photos of the U.S. Vice President and the Nigeria’s Vice President as each visited their country’s flood areas. They quickly turned these disasters into some horrific political banter, with the least inclination that these were a nightmare moments.

Unfortunately, and most inconsiderately, these Nigerians may have also totally forgotten their responsibilities as citizens in times of adversity. They had spent their time watching and comparing political leaders who often visit disaster sites for media photo opportunities but snubbed their civic responsibilities as citizens, and their characteristics as human beings. Now that the storms in Texas, US, and Benue State – Nigeria are over, we must not just compare or analyze how leaders took photos at the disaster sites, but also, how the masses in both countries reacted.

Before and During Hurricane Harvey, Americans took to the social media sharing every available information about weather forecast; highlighting projected danger areas, and tracking updates on storm timelines. In fact, all the key information we received from the newsroom, such as how and where to purchase household needs, and significant help and rescue phone numbers came through citizens. During Harvey, Wassaps and Twitters were kept busy with folks communicating safety and sharing information about which areas are flooded and where to get help. Politics was set aside, for even Donald Trump hugged Immigrants and took selfies with folks he found strange.

So how did the Nigerians react during the terrible flood in Benue State? Most of them had no idea there was a flood. In the Facebook, news clips about this disaster were ignored while most Nigerians were busy having fun with political subjects unconnected with their basic needs. After this flood disaster, when photos of this horrific event eventually made it to the network, Nigerians then saw an opportunity to argue politics and bash a governance system they (Voters) inspired.

It makes sense to compare how America and Nigeria leaders respectively visited their flood disaster areas. It would be most appropriate and fair also to examine how citizens reacted to these events; how they assisted in communicating care and compassion. We must compare the citizens, on how Americans were in the Social Media delivering safety, and Nigerian masses were on Facebook watching European Soccer. We must also share how the Americans utilized the social media applications to secure and share rescue possibilities, whereas Nigerians were on Social media tagging, sharing, and insensitively jeering their system with photos of their disaster areas.

The worst thing that could happen to a country might not just be bad leadership, but also an inability of the masses to articulate their core responsibilities as good citizens. In Nigeria, the voting block is polarized with strange idiosyncrasies. They would tell you everything about European soccer but have no damn idea about how a specific candidacy or policy would affect their livelihoods. In most cases, their thoughts and actions about public policies are bone out of self-centeredness, ethnic connectivity, and cruelty. A lack of interest in matters of public policies explains why they have been behind in moving their political process; and why they have been grounded in the same system with the same leaders for decades.

Dr. Anthony Ogbo is the Publisher/Editor International Guardian News and Strategic Advisor, Center of Excellence, Consumer Arts and Sciences at the Houston Community College. Direct Contact >>>

Africa Roundup: eBay expands, Google CEO visits Lagos, Ghana enters space

eBay opened up its U.S. platform to Africa through its partnership with MallforAfrica.com. Americans can now buy products on eBay from select vendors in six African countries, starting with merchandise categories of fashion, art, jewelry, and clothing.

For the new program, MallforAfrica selects the sellers and handles payments on its proprietary platform. DHL is the shipping partner. Online shoppers can browse the entire collection on eBay’s Mall for Africa Store.

The new online channel expands an existing relationship between the two e-commerce companies. In  2016, they launched the eBay Powered by MallforAfrica platform allowing U.S. vendors to sell in Africa.

The program taps goods from merchants in Nigeria, Kenya, Ghana, South Africa, and Burundi. “We’ll be adding more sellers and more countries,” eBay’s Sylvie de Wever told TechCrunch in this feature.

Google launched new Africa initiatives, on the back of CEO Sundar Pichai’s recent Nigeria trip.

While visiting Lagos he announced the global internet services company’s plans to train 10 million Africans in digital skills over the next 5 years. Alphabet will also increase its funding to African startups, provide $20 million in grants to digital non-profits, and offer modified versions of products (such as YouTube) in Africa―where internet users can face costlier data plans and slower download speeds than other Google markets.

“A lot of what we’re doing is making it easier for the average person to take advantage of the web,” Bunmi Banjo, Google’s Growth Engine and Brand Lead for Sub-Saharan Africa, told TechCrunch.

Ghana’s first sattelite―GhanaSat-1―began its orbit recently, with a little help from some friends. The cubesat, built by a Ghanaian engineering team at All Nations University, was delivered to NASA’s International Space Station in June on a SpaceX rocket that took off from pad 39a at Kennedy Space Center, a NASA spokesperson.

Weeks later, GhanaSat-1 deployed into orbit from the Center and is now operational.

“This particular satellite has two missions,” Project Manager Damoah told TechCrunch. “It has cameras on board for detailed monitoring of the coastlines of Ghana. Then there’s an educational piece―we want to use it to integrate satellite technology into high school curriculum.”

The GhanaSat-1 deployment marks increased interest and activity in Africa toward space exploration.  Nigeria’s first cubesat launched on the same SpaceX mission. Several nations, such as South Africa, Nigeria, Kenya and Ethiopia have space agencies. Angola announced its intention to launch a satellite over the coming year.

And the African Union announced its African Space Policy and Strategy initiative last year prompting AU members states  “to realize an African Outer space Programme, as one of the flagship programs….of the AU Agenda.”

Could we see an African space station sometime in the future? It seems quite ambitious. But then again, not so many years sceptics doubted that Africa’s tech sector would ever attract big VC, blue chip IT companies, or produce unicorns. All those milestones have been passed.

THE IBADAN DECLARATION – COMMUIQUE OF YORUBA SUMMIT HELD IN IBADAN ON 7TH SEPTEMBER 2017

Dr. Kunle Olajide and Ooni of Ife, Oba Adeyeye Ogunwusi at the pan Yoruba summit on restructuring in Ibadan.
PREAMBLE
Leaders and people of Yoruba nation met in a solemn gathering at the Lekan Salami Stadium,Adamasingba Ibadan to deliberate on the restructuring agenda and the future of Nigeria, The summit was attended by Yoruba leaders, governors, parliamentarians ,Yoruba social cultural groups, professional bodies, market leaders ,youth groups and friends of the Yoruba nation
After exhaustive deliberations by the largest gathering of Yoruba people from the six south-west states.kwara and kogi states, the following communique was adopted.
Summit recalls with nostalgia, the great strides made by the Yoruba nation in the years of self-government up until the abrogation of the federal constitution in 1966 evident in mass literacy, novel infrastructural strides and giant leaps in all spheres of human development.
Summit noted that the crisis of over-centralization has led to mass misery in across the country with poverty levels at 72%, unemployment rate at 65% internal immigration and internal displacement, security threat in form of Boko Haram, herdsmen and organized crime.
Summit convinced that Nigeria is careering dangerously to the edge of the slope except urgent steps are taken to restructure Nigeria from a unitary constitution to a federal constitution as negotiated by our founding fathers at independence in 1960, it was resolved as follows:
1. That Yoruba insists that Nigeria must return to a proper federation as obtained in the 1960 and 1963 constitutions. This has been our position since 1950 Ibadan conference and developments in Nigeria over the last fifty years reinforce our conviction.
2. That Yoruba are clear that restructuring does not mean different things to different people other than that a multi-ethnic country like Nigeria can only know real peace and development if it is run ONLY along federal lines.
3. That the greatest imperatives of restructuring Nigeria is to move from a rent-seeking and money sharing anti-development economy to productivity by ensuring that the federating units are free to own and develop their resources. They should pay agreed sums to the federation purse to implement central services.
4. That the federating units- whether states, zones or regions must themselves be governed by written constitution to curb impurity at all levels.
5. Nigeria shall be a federation comprised of six regions and the federal capital Territory, Abuja.
6. The Federal Government shall make laws and only have powers in relation to items specified on the legislative list contained in the constitution of the Federation.
7. The Regions shall in turn be composed as states.
8. Each Regions shall have its own constitution containing enumerated exclusive and concurrent legislative lists regarding matters upon which the regions and the states may act or legislate.
9. Contiguous territories, ethnic nationalities or settlement shall be at liberty through a plebiscite, to elect to be part of any contiguous region other than the region in which the current geo-political zone or state boundaries places them.
10. States as presently comprised in the geo-political zones into which they fall, which shall become regions, shall continue to exercise the executive, legislative and judicial functions currently exercised at that level of government.
11. The States with a region shall determine the items on the legislative lists in the Regional constitution for the purpose of good government and the administration and provision of common inter-state social, economic and infrastructural requirements. Residual powers shall be vested in the states
12. The power to create states shall be within the exclusive powers of the region which shall be obliged to create a state provided a plebiscite is conducted, following a request by an agreed percentage of the residents of the ethnic nationality within a state. The procedure for conducting a plebiscite and the percentage of any ethnic nationality shall be out in the regional constitution.
13. The power to create local governments and assign functions to them shall be vested in the states.
14. States shall be entitled to manage all resources found within their boundaries and the revenue accruing therefrom. The issue of the entitlement of littoral states to offshore resources and the extension of such rights from the continental shelf and rights accruing to the federal government shall be determined by the national assembly.
15. The sharing ration of all revenues raised by means of taxation shall be 50% to the states, 35% to the regional government and 15% to the government of the federation.
16. For a period of 10years from the commencement of the operation of the new constitution (or such other agreed period to be enshrined in the federal constitution) there shall be a special fund for the development of all minerals in the country. The Government of the federation shall raise this sum by way of additional taxation on resources at a rate to be agreed by the National Assembly. The National Assembly shall set up a body to manage the funds with equal representation of nominees from each of the Regional governments and shall also set out and specify the guidelines for the administration of the funds exclusively for this purpose. The president of the Federation shall appoint a chairperson for the entity so formed.
That these agreed positions of the Yoruba taken today shall form the basis of negotiations with our partners in the Nigerian project for a United Nigeria based on Justice, peace and fair play.
Chief Afe Babalola (SAN)
Summit Chairman
Dr. Kunle Olajide
Chairman Planning Committee

Prime Minister Abubakar Tafawa Balewa’s Electrifying 1961 American Visit – Must Watch Video

 

Article by Dr. By Farooq A.  was published in Saturday, April 7, 2012

A couple of days ago, I watched an enchanting 27-minute video of the July 1961 U.S. visit of Nigeria’s first Prime Minister Abubakar Tafawa Balewa and couldn’t help feeling a surge of spine-tingling emotion. The video not only took me on an exciting time travel to the 1960s when the enormous hopes invested in Nigeria by the world caused it to be deeply respected everywhere; it also took me on an excursion into the mind and character of some of our immediate post-independence leaders.

I stumbled on the video on the website of the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum and immediately shared it with my friends on Facebook.

Between July 25 and July 28, the late Abubakar Tafawa Balewa and his modest entourage of about 10 key government officials (in contrast to the unwieldy herds of indolent hangers-on that accompany Nigerian presidents on foreign visits these days) visited the United States at the invitation of the late President John F. Kennedy during which Tafawa Balewa visited major historical landmarks in representative parts of the United States and addressed a special joint session of the United States Congress that was convened in his honor.

Only a select few are accorded the honor of addressing a joint session of the United States Congress. Certainly no Nigerian head of state has been accorded this honor since Tafawa Balewa, as far as I am aware. According to the website of the Office of the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives, since 1874 when the King of Hawaii first addressed a joint meeting of the U.S. Congress, there have been only 112 such privileges granted to foreign leaders and dignitaries.

Tafawa Balewa’s powerfully delivered speech to the joint session was punctuated many times by loud, sustained standing ovations. That’s not a regular occurrence, either.

And in all the cities he and his entourage visited, exultant crowds of Americans came out to wave at them hospitably, and U.S. government officials bowed reverently when they shook hands with the Prime Minister. Such was the depth of respect Nigeria inspired in 1960s America. Perhaps it also had something to do with the personality of the Prime Minister.

He exuded infectious grandeur. He was supremely self-assured, deliberate, measured, and spoke with perfect aplomb. Although he spoke off the cuff most of the time, his words were carefully chosen and brilliantly delivered. His golden, ringing voice inspired awe (no wonder he was dubbed the “Golden Voice of Africa”) and his self-confidence was contagious.

When I compare the Tafawa Balewa I saw in the 27-minute video with the Nigerian leaders that have visited America since I’ve lived here, the contrast couldn’t be starker. When the late President Umar Musa Yar’adua visited America in September 2007, for instance, he was swept away. As I wrote in a December 28, 2008 article titled “What Yar’adua is learning and NOT learning from America,” the late president was “so overawed by the grandeur of the White House—and the ‘honor’ of shaking the hands of President Bush— that he declared the visit ‘a rare opportunity’ and a ‘moment that I will never forget in my life.’”

President Goodluck Jonathan was also intimidated by America in his two major visits here. (Read my April 16, 2010 article titled “Dr. Goodluck Jonathan, that was embarrassing” for my account of then acting President Goodluck Jonathan’s first official visit to America). The man was thoroughly overwhelmed, and his countless gaucheries throughout the visit gave the outward manifestation of a man who was held hostage by a profound lack of self-confidence.

To be clear, rhetorical brilliance and self-confidence in and of themselves don’t make good leaders. In fact, if I am given a choice between a suave, urbane, and cosmopolitan leader who is ineffective and a rustic, diffident, tongue-tied, and barely educated leader who is effective I would choose the latter without the slightest hesitation. I’m sure that’s true for most Nigerians. Unfortunately, with a few exceptions, Nigeria’s post-First Republic leaders are not only rustic, diffident, tongue-tied, and functionally illiterate, they are also notoriously ineffective, not to talk of insanely corrupt. That is why I can’t help celebrating the grace, verbal elegance, and grandeur of a leader whose generation got a bad rap for being inadequately educated.

The comment of a London-based Nigerian lawyer by the name of Chukwuemeka Reuben Okala who watched the video and shared his thoughts on a listserv captured the sentiments of many Nigerians on cyberspace.

“Abubakar was very articulate, well composed, confident and had a very good command of English language,” he wrote on a Nigerian Internet discussion forum called TalkNigeria. “From his body language, one could see that he knew whom he was— the head of a government of an independent state. Yet Nigeria was barely 1 year old at that time. Hitherto, I had dismissed Abubakar as a naive, semi-illiterate primary school teacher, based on what (wrong articles) I read about him. I now realise that, that impression was fraught with flaws and totally unfair to a man who had a very good grasp of his position. Abubakar was indeed solid. I’m more than impressed!”

I am a critic of chronocentricity and reverse chronocentricity, but I can’t resist valorizing our past and lamenting the diminution of our social and symbolic capital as a nation over the years. (Chronocentricity, which you’re unlikely to find in a regular dictionary, denotes the tendency for people to think that their generation is superior to the generations that preceded it, and reverse chronocentricity, which is my coinage by the way, is the tendency for people to unduly celebrate and sentimentalize the past and inaugurate it as superior to their present).

My reverse chronocentricity has basis in facts. As another commenter on TalkNigeria who goes by the handle Nebukadineze wrote, “Indeed, Nigeria don pafuka [is finished] for real. PM Balewa was invited to address a joint session of the US Congress (a seminal honor… accorded not just anybody) and he received numerous rounds of thunderous applause. Today, if any Nigerian leader mistakenly walks into Capitol Hill, it is almost a certainty that the Capitol Hill police will arrest him and hand him over to the US Marshals.”

This is obviously an intentional exaggeration, but the writer’s point is that no Nigerian leader, certainly not the present one, has come even remotely close to living up to the standards of regal splendor and verbal dexterity that the late Tafawa Balewa set. May his soul rest in peace.

 

Fate of 800,000 school kid in jeopardy as Trump announces end to the Dream Act

“I do not favor punishing children, most of whom are now adults, for the actions of their parents. But we must also recognize that we are nation of opportunity because we are a nation of laws.”  – Donald Trump

The Trump administration Tuesday formally announced it will end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program — also called DACA — putting an expiration date on the legal protections granted to roughly 800,000 people known as “DREAMers,” who entered the country illegally as children.

President Trump issued a statement, saying, “I do not favor punishing children, most of whom are now adults, for the actions of their parents. But we must also recognize that we are nation of opportunity because we are a nation of laws.”

He also said he looks forward to working with Republicans and Democrats in Congress to address immigration issues “in a manner that puts the hardworking citizens of our country first.”

Attorney General Jeff Sessions, a longtime opponent of the policy, made the formal announcement Tuesday morning. He called DACA “unilateral executive amnesty,” and said the Obama administration “deliberately sought to achieve what the legislative branch specifically refused to authorize on multiple occasions. Such an open-ended circumvention of immigration laws was an unconstitutional exercise of authority by the executive branch.” He said DACA “denied jobs to hundreds of thousands of Americans by allowing those same illegal aliens to take those jobs.

Homeland Security Acting Secretary Elaine Duke said the administration, facing legal challenges to the program, “chose the least disruptive option,” letting the program wind down in six months, and placing the onus on a sharply divided Congress to enact former President Barack Obama’s executive action into law.

In a statement, Duke said no current beneficiaries will be affected before March 5 of next year. But she said, “No new initial requests or associated applications filed after today will be acted on.”

Duke said the administration’s decision to terminate DACA “was not taken lightly. The Department of Justice has carefully evaluated the program’s constitutionality and determined it conflicts with our existing immigration laws.”

Trump signaled the decision earlier on Tuesday, tweeting, “Congress, get ready to do your job – DACA.”

House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., responded to the announcement in a statement saying, “It is my hope that the House and Senate, with the president’s leadership, will be able to find consensus on a permanent legislative solution that includes ensuring that those who have done nothing wrong can still contribute as a valued part of this great country.”

Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York called the administration’s decision “heartless.” He said Democrats “will do everything we can to prevent President Trump’s terribly wrong order from becoming reality.”

DACA allowed individuals who were brought to the U.S. as children or teens before mid-2007 to apply for protection from deportation and work permits if they met certain requirements. Beneficiaries had to be under the age of 16 upon entering the country; no older than 31 as of June 15, 2012; lived continuously in the U.S. since mid-2007; be enrolled in high school or college, already have a diploma or degree, have a GED certificate or be an honorably discharged veteran of the U.S. military; and have no felony criminal convictions, significant misdemeanor convictions, no more than three other misdemeanor convictions or otherwise pose a threat to national security or public safety.

The program did not provide lawful immigration status. Instead, through what the Obama administration characterized as the exercise of prosecutorial discretion, it granted a deferral from possibly being removed from the U.S. to those who qualified; it also granted work permits. The deferrals and permits were granted for two-year periods and could be renewed for additional two-year periods.

The Department of Homeland Security says existing DACA participants whose eligibility expires between now and March 5 have until Oct. 5 to apply for renewal. The department will also “adjudicate on an individual case-by-case basis” requests to enroll in the program and for renewal that were received as of Tuesday. However, new applications will not be accepted going forward.

Valid permits will remain in effect until they expire, “unless terminated or revoked” before then, according to a fact sheet on the DHS website.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement says its enforcement priorities have not changed. It has no plans to target DACA holders as their permits expire. They will be eligible for deportation, but remain a low priority.

The USCIS generally has not referred cases in which a person’s DACA application is denied to immigration enforcement authorities unless the case involves a criminal offense, fraud or a threat to national security or public safety.

The “DREAMers” had been in legal limbo since the start of the current administration. Throughout his campaign, Trump railed against the 2012 executive order signed by Obama — and pledged to “immediately terminate the policy” once he took office.

But after being sworn in, he expressed some compassion toward DACA recipients. In an interview with ABC News on Jan. 25, Trump said, “They shouldn’t be very worried. I do have a big heart. We’re going to take care of everybody.”

The Obama program was thrown into the center of a looming court battle in late June when a coalition of 10 state attorneys general, led by Texas’ Ken Paxton, threatened to sue the Trump administration as early as Sept. 5 if it refused to phase out DACA. They argued that Obama had overstepped his authority in creating and implementing the program. Only Congress has the authority to legislate such a change in U.S. immigration law, they contended.

“[T]he program represents an unconstitutional exercise of legislative power by the Executive Branch,” Paxton wrote in an op-ed for USA Today in late July. “Phasing out DACA is about the rule of law, not the wisdom of any particular immigration policy,” Paxton also wrote at the time before emphasizing the principle of separation of powers at the heart of the structure of the federal government.

Sessions had advocated for the termination of DACA but, as BuzzFeed reported in March, he was often out-argued by former chief of staff Reince Priebus and former chief strategist Steve Bannon, who like Trump, wanted to see it preserved.

Bannon, who held hardline views on immigration that aligned more closely with the attorney general on other policy issues, reportedly had convinced the president to spare DREAMers and use them “as a strategic asset in the coming immigration policy battles.”

But with Bannon and Priebus now gone from the West Wing, it appears the position held by Sessions and Stephen Miller, another Trump White House aide with ties to Sessions, has won out — under the pressure exerted by Paxton and some of his fellow state attorneys general.

Trump’s decision leaves Congress facing increasing pressure to find a solution for a population that was estimated in 2012 to include as many as 1.8 million immigrants — of which about 800,000 have been granted deferred status under DACA.

At the moment there are at least two bipartisan bills that could grant legal status or create a pathway to citizenship for those who were eligible for DACA. In July, Sens. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., introduced a new version of the DREAM Act, after which the DREAMers are named. And a companion bill was filed in the House by Reps. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Fla., and Lucille Roybal-Allard, D-Calif.

Additionally, Rep. Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill., introduced the American Hope Act. While Rep. Carlos Curbelo, R-Fla., introduced the Recognizing America’s Children Act, a plan that has some support in his party.

Durbin introduced an earlier version of the DREAM Act — the “Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors Act” — in late 2010; that bill failed to get enough votes to allow a floor vote. But the legislative project goes back much longer than the middle of Obama’s first term as president. Durbin first filed legislation about the DREAMers in 2001. “Other versions passed the House in 2010 and in the Senate, as part of a larger immigration bill, in 2013. But no bill has ever been passed by both chambers,”according to the Washington Post.

People attend an orientation class in filing out their application for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program at Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles in August 2012 in Los Angeles, Calif.

Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images

In 2012, Obama stepped in with the DACA program when Congress failed to pass a version of the DREAM Act then. At the time, Obama justified his action saying, “These are young people who study in our schools, they play in our neighborhoods, they’re friends with our kids, they pledge allegiance to our flag. They are Americans in their heart, in their minds, in every single way but one: on paper.”

In an interview with Wisconsin talk radio WCLO on Friday, House Speaker Ryan said that he opposes the Trump administration ending DACA and that it is up to Congress to find a legislative fix to the question of what to do with the DREAMers. The speaker said that Obama was wrong to act without Congress and that Trump should defer to Congress to fix the issue.

“Having said all of that there are people who are in limbo. These are kids who know no other country, who were brought here by their parents and don’t know another home,” Ryan said. “And so I really do believe there needs to be a legislative solution, that’s one that we’re working on, and I think we want to give people peace of mind.”

On Sunday, Sept. 3, 2017 photo, supporters of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program (DACA), demonstrate on Pennsylvania Avenue in front of the White House in Washington. President Donald Trump is expected to announce that he will end protections for young immigrants who were brought into the country illegally as children, but with a six-month delay, people familiar with the plans said. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais) ORG XMIT: DCPM101

Responding to Ryan’s comments, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., wrote Ryan, according to Politicoasking that he meet with the Congressional Hispanic Caucus and other House Democratic leaders “to discuss a comprehensive legislative solution for our country’s DREAMers.” In her letter, the top Democrat in the House also said legislative action was necessary “to shield … [the] DREAMers from the arbitrary cruelty of deportation.”

Whatever Congress may do, another potential consequence of Trump’s action is that it is likely to bring his predecessor, who is arguably the country’s most high-profile Democrat, back into the political debate over the fate of the DREAMers.

In his final news conference as president and just days before Trump was inaugurated, Obama said he would remain largely silent for the next year on most political issues — with a few exceptions where the nation’s “core values” might be at stake, in his view. Among those, was taking action against the DREAMers, including deportation.

“The notion that we would just arbitrarily or because of politics punish those kids, when they didn’t do something themselves … would merit my speaking out,” he said.

Osteen and McIngvale: between preaching Christ, and practicing the values Christ lived

Rev. Osteen (right) and Mr. McIngvale are successful businessmen – one making money by trading on ‘Scriptures’, whereas the other sells his skills in furniture production and sales.

“Pastorship” is an office; pastor is a position. Both bear no relevance to the spiritual values of salvation of individual souls. The divine implications of the Parable of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:25 – 37) illustrate the true meaning of “neighbor,” demonstrating that proximity does not justify goodwill.”

By Anthony Obi Ogbo  Houston, TX

Besides Justin James “J. J.” Watt, the popular American football defensive end for Houston Texans, the two most familiar faces on the local TV screens are Joel Scott Osteen, Senior Pastor of Lakewood Church in Houston, Texas, and Jim “Mattress Mack” McIngvale, businessman and philanthropist, and owner of the Gallery Furniture retail chain. Both have benefited immensely from Houston’s largess as fourth largest city in the United States; they may have also received grants through Not-for-Profit engagements, and in turn, facilitated millions of dollars in charitable ventures that benefited not only individuals, but also the development of the social system.

But Houston is not inconsiderate. The Clutch City population shower both the Lakewood Church and Gallery Furniture with unprecedented patronage while the media accord unimaginable coverage to their activities. Equally, the city government has been supportive too allowing both entities flexible policy actions and intangible rewards.

Evacuees relaxing inside a Gallery Furniture facility. Mr. McIngvale had welcomed those flooded out of their homes into his two Houston gigantic stores, holding about 400 survivors at some point.

In the social community, both men however, are indeed perceived differently. The smooth-talking pastor, Reverend Osteen is viewed as a man of God who presides over more than 50,000 congregation members – dispersing sermons televised to over seven million viewers weekly and over 20 million monthly in over 100 countries. Mr. McIngvale known as “Mattress Mack” remained the unapologetic business guru who would tell you how he built his business from just about nothing and propelled it to the top. He is an innovative manager who singlehandedly designed his business transformation strategies and made his money, one-dime-at-a-time, to attain his current accomplishment. For instance, in 2014, McIngvale conceptualized, designed, and launched his new line of “Mack-O-Pedic” therapeutic mattresses.

In summary, both Rev. Osteen and Mr. McIngvale are successful businessmen – one making money by trading on ‘Scriptures’, whereas the other sells his skills in furniture production and sales. So, when the news of how both men handled their ‘faith’ during the deadly Hurricane Harvey, the first major hurricane to make landfall in the United States since Wilma in 2005, the social media went agog. Discussion threads rendered outspoken appraisal of actions and inactions; they specifically lambasted the supposed ‘Man of God’, Rev. Osteen for a lack of empathy in the face of the devastation and monumental emergency outcome following the disaster.

Harvey was not a Hollywood Movie. She made good all her threats and ravaged thousands of victims. For instance, just in four days, some Houston areas received more than 40 inches of rain with thunder, earth-shattering wild wind, and calamitous flooding. Hundreds of thousands of homes were displaced, while more than 30,000 people were endangered. But at the beginning, and in fact, peak of the moment, Houstonians were sleepless offering helps at various capacities. From Houston’s Mayor, council members and officials, to the media, church leaders and humanitarian organizations – all hands were on the deck. Emergency workers took calculated risks to save lives of many trapped and traumatized by the calamity. Business owners who were trapped broke their company protocols and gave verbal approvals orders for emergency workers to break into their facilities and use them for shelters.

Reverend Osteen took the mainstream media where he had much influence to stage-manage a defense of his ungodly action or inaction. Yet images like the above photo overwhelmed the Social Media lampooning his actions.

This was when Joel Osteen and his wife Victoria chose to go to the twitters to offer prayers for the shattering moment. But their prayers were still normal, because worldwide, Houston received similar blessings. What gave the Osteens up for public denouncement was the report that they ‘refused’ to open their facility for relief activities because “the neighborhood was badly flooded and inaccessible”. A videos of Lakewood posted in the social media, however showed the opposite – revealing that the area was very accessible, and in fact, justifying the claims that the church leaders actually shut the door of a facility that could have provided shelter for up to 16,000 or more people given the size of Lakewood Church.

To make matters worse, Reverend Osteen took the mainstream media where he had much influence to stage-manage a defense of his ungodly action or inaction. Finally of sheer shame, he opened the doors out his church, called in church members and leaders, and went to the media to announce relief services. Of course, members of the church launched an image-redemption attack in the social media in their worship center and their Pastor.

Conversely, Mr. McIngvale who had been committed to rescue and relief activities even before Harvey, immediately turned his showroom into a shelter for victims when hostile storm did hit. He had welcomed those flooded out of their homes into his two Houston gigantic stores, holding about 400 survivors at some point. Victims were allowed to use exquisite and expensive brand new beds, beddings and sofas; relief workers were even seen taking nap-breaks in-between their hectic duties at McIngvale’s.

While these moments are still trending in the social media, the lessons of life may have again explained the thin psychological line between preaching Christ, and practicing the values that Christ lived and addressed. “Pastorship” is an office; pastor is a position. Both bear no relevance to the spiritual values of salvation of individual souls. The divine implications of the Parable of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:25 – 37) illustrate the true meaning of “neighbor,” demonstrating that proximity does not justify goodwill. In reality, the process of church may be seen as downright business, and has no connection whatsoever in defining individual characters.

Matthew 7:12 forms the basis for the Golden Rule: “So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets.” (NIV). This Golden Rule decodes the moral philosophy of life irrespective of individual beliefs. In addition, the Ten Commandments invokes the ultimate distinction of religious practice and dovetails both the Mosaic Law, and the Christ’s Sermon on the Mount, charging the need for human decency, love, and kindness.

Reverend Osteen has indeed lavished time, money, and resources trying to clean his errors; this act brings to question his leadership competence in matters of faith and spirituality. Hurricane Harvey has indeed tested his spiritual sure footing, and without the klieg lights and camera cosmetic flashes, the bareness of Osteen’s natural face is clearly viewed. Many Lakewood Church members may have been mortified by the actions of their ‘revered pastor’; they still believe that ‘something went wrong’. But confession augments apology – thus, a public confession for falling short in his spiritual and moral responsibilities and a simple apology – rather than the thoughtless self-defense campaign, would have subdued the impending embarrassment. Is this confession late? Absolutely not.

♦ Author, Anthony Ogbo, Ph.D is the publisher of Houston-based International Guardian, and the Founder of American Journal of Transformational Leadership.

x Close

Like Us On Facebook