“America First” Backlash – Africa’s leaders consider a future when the U.S. no longer cares

African Union Commission Chairwoman Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma, center, with the heads of state at the opening session of the A.U. summit. (European Pressphoto Agency)

ADDIS ABABA, Ethiopia — In Barack Obama’s landmark speech before the African Union in July 2015 — the first by a sitting U.S. president — he told the assembled heads of state and delegates that the United States was ready to be a development partner with the continent, while warning that would come along with American promotion of human rights, whether they liked it or not.

“You are kind of stuck with us — this is how we are. We believe in these things and we’re going to keep talking about them,” he said to applause and laughter from the delegates.

Now a year-and-a-half later, the African Union is grappling with a new U.S. president who has said very little about Africa but looks set to step away from decades of bipartisan investment in Africa and has advocated using torture during interrogations.

At the African Union’s annual summit meeting in Addis Ababa that ended Tuesday, Africa’s leaders heatedly debated a number of issues, including whom to elect as chairman, whether to admit Morocco, and whether to walk out from the International Criminal Court. But beyond the official agenda was a sense of unease over what many see as a new era of nationalism ushered in by the election of President Trump.

Outgoing African Union chairwoman Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma departed from her prepared remarks opening the summit to lash out at Trump over his executive order banning refugees.

“It is clear that globally, we are entering very turbulent times. For an example, the very country to whom many of our people were taken as slaves during the transatlantic slave trade has now decided to ban refugees from some of our countries,” she said.

“What do we do about this? Indeed, this is one of the greatest challenges to our unity and solidarity,” she said.

Starting with the Bill Clinton administration, the United States began to increasingly focus on Africa. Aid quadrupled under the George W. Bush administration, particularly with his PEPFAR program aimed at stamping out AIDS in the continent. (With each administration, a new acronym to promote trade, health, good government was born, including AGOA, giving countries with good human rights records better access to U.S. markets; YALI, the Young African Leadership Initiative of Obama; PEPFAR; and Power Africa, to increase electricity on the continent.)

 Questions from Trump’s transition team to the State Department about Africa suggest a deep skepticism about many of these African programs, which they contend are mired in corruption and don’t help the continent. Programs such as PEPFAR and AGOA were specifically questioned as whether they were worth the funds, and there was the point-blank question of why we should be sending aid to Africa when there is poverty at home.

Many experts believe those programs will come to an end under the administration of Trump, who has been skeptical about international aid and suggested that the money would be better spent on Americans.

“I must regretfully conclude that the future of all such partnership is in doubt,” said Reuben E. Brigety, a former U.S. ambassador to the African Union and now the dean of George Washington University’s Elliott School of International Affairs. Brigety held a number of positions in the Obama administration dealing with Africa.

“Because of the rapid fire and unconventional methods by which Trump has upended vital relationships from Mexico and China in a matter of days, one cannot assume continuity in any of America’s initiatives in Africa,” he said in a lecture in the Ethiopian capital timed to coincide with the summit.

He added that Trump’s public backing of torture would also send the wrong message to the continent’s autocrats.

“It is outrageous, it is absolutely outrageous,” he said. “Of course, one can just see the thought process of any number of leaders of other places, ‘well if the president of United States says it’s okay,’ ” he said.

For years, the African Union, a fractious body of 54 members — 55 with Morocco’s joining — has struggled to put forward a united front. The body is divided by politics and especially language, with countries preferring English often squaring off against those that use French on a daily basis.

The divisions are also economic, with the continent’s trade primarily with other countries rather than internal. Many borders are also closed and there are high tariffs — not to mention a lack of roads and transportation infrastructure connecting the countries. Only 10 percent of Africa’s trade is inside the continent.

One of the long proposed solutions has been a continentwide free-trade agreement, which members said is more urgent than ever.

“If you look at the world, if you look today at the United States and its policies, people are talking more about nationalism and [bringing] back jobs to America,” said Fatima Haram Acyle, the commissioner for trade and industry. “Africa also needs to focus on really its own priorities, its own markets, its own people.”

She was echoed by the outgoing deputy chairman of the union who admitted that with the election of Trump and his “America first” rhetoric, member states have a new impetus to make this free-trade agreement a reality.

“What we hear of the pronouncements from the U.S. president, it makes it even more urgent that we must move quickly,” said Erastus Mwencha.

The A.U. has promised to enact the free-trade agreement this year, which may be a bit optimistic for a sweeping dismantling of non-tariff trade barriers across the continent, but at the very least, the countries will begin discussing a draft of the agreement.

“It will take a long time to establish these things, you can’t do them overnight, but if there is one thing that will in the longer term lead to a more peaceful Africa, it will be an Africa trading more freely with itself,” said Elissa Jobson, an expert on the African Union with the International Crisis Group consultancy.

“It makes sense with or without Trump,” she said.

Shocking: Donald Trump Tweeted This Disgusting Thing About Kate Middleton in 2012

News broke this afternoon that President Donald Trump has accepted an invitation from the Queen of England to come to England on a state visit. It’s unclear whether Prince William, Prince Harry, or Kate Middleton will be in attendance during this, but the Duchess of Cambridge already has a good reason to skip out.

Buzzfeed just posted a reminder that in 2012, then-presidential hopeful Donald Trump had this to say when topless photos of KMidd, snapped by paparazzi while she was sunbathing on a private vacation, were going around:

Super Bowl 2017: The Complete Guide to Events and Parties

DJ Khaled, Taylor Swift and Bruno Mars

From a custom multilevel space built for ESPN to Taylor Swift performing for DirecTV Now, here’s what’s happening at the hottest bashes — three of which will feature DJ Khaled — happening around the big game in Houston.

Hollywood is hitting Houston for Super Bowl LI.

Before Tom Brady and Matt Ryan face off and Lady Gaga takes the stage for the much anticipated halftime show, there’s a slew of parties and performances happening off the field.

Taylor Swift will perform for DirecTV Now’s Super Saturday Night, Bruno Mars sold out tickets to his show at Club Nomadic in less than a minute, The Chainsmokers and Sam Hunt will perform at the same club the night before that, and DJ Khaled is party hopping and performing all weekend long.

Below is The Hollywood Reporter‘s full guide to all of the hottest happenings for Super Bowl weekend.

Thursday, Feb. 2

EA Sports Bowl
Club Nomadic, 2121 Edwards St, 7p.m.

The 2-month-old, 62,500-square-foot nightclub will first transform into a Madden and FIFA ’17 tournament and then, Billboard chart-toppers The Chainsmokers and country star Sam Hunt will perform.

TAO Group Takeover
Spire, 1720 Main St., Feb. 2-5

Joining forces with upscale hospitality team The Cle Group, the TAO Group will be hosting a weekendlong takeover. DJ Carnage is taking over Thursday Night and RL Grime on Friday, and the Playboy Party will take over Spire on Saturday with a special performance by Flo Rida.

Friday, Feb. 3

Art After Dark
Club Nomadic, 2121 Edwards St, 9 p.m.

Super Bowl 50 headliner Bruno Mars stars in this sold-out gig at Club Nomadic, also featuring DJ Khaled. The night is hosted by PepsiCo’s new premium bottled water, LIFEWTR.

Club Nomadic
Club Nomadic

Planet New Era
Vrsi, 820 Holman St., 9p.m.

Rapper Bun-B will host the New Era Cap event at Houston hotspot Vrsi, which will feature performances by 2Chainz, Migos, Lil Uzi Vert and Will Smith’s son Trey, otherwise known as DJ Ace. Khloe Kardashian’s ex James Harden of the Houston Rockets is expected to be there, as is the Chicago Bulls’ Dwyane Wade.

The Barstool Party
Rich’s Houston, 2401 San Jacinto St., 9p.m.

Barstool Sports is throwing a bash with performances by Ja Rule, Ashantie, Mike Stud and more.

ESPN the Party

10 p.m.

The invite-only party takes off at a 65,000-square-foot warehouse outside of Houston’s downtown arts district. For the 12th consecutive year, Tony Schubert of Event Eleven will design and produce the annual bash, transforming the warehouse into a multilevel, interactive party with over 1,000 LED tubes and moving lights, a live muralist and photo booth. Last year, Nick Jonas took the stage and this year Fergie and DJ Khaled are partnering up to get the party weekend started.

ESPN the Party 2017 Rendering
ESPN the Party 2017 Rendering

Saturday, Feb. 4

30th Annual Leigh Steinberg Super Bowl Party
Hughes Manor, 12 p.m. 

Presented by BBVA Compass, sports agent Leigh Steinberg will return to Super Bowl weekend to host his annual charity event. Past attendees have included George Clooney, Oliver Stone, Gabrielle Union and Jay Leno. This year Cuba Gooding Jr., David Arquette and 2Chainz are expected to attend.

The Giving Back Fund’s Big Game Big Give
Private Home of Michael and Lisa Holthouse, 6:30 p.m.

Josh Brolin hosts and David Schwimmer emcees at the annual benefit ($1.6 million was raised in 2016) at the estate of Michael and Lisa Holthouse. Tickets are $3,000, but 100 percent tax deductible. For the first time ever there will be a celebrity poker tournament afterparty hosted by Jamie Gold and Michael Phelps. Rob Riggle will emcee and Common will perform at the afterparty.

Taste of the NFL
University of Houston, 4800 Calhoun Rd., 7 p.m.

The University of Houston hosts this event to fight hunger where NFL teams partner with chefs from across the country to prepare tastings and pour wine for 3,000.

The MAXIM Party
Smart Financial Centre at Sugarland, 8 p.m.

It’s a three-fer for DJ Khaled, who’ll perform at Smart Financial Centre along with Travis Scott for the likes of Anthony Anderson and Chace Crawford. The party is presented by Thomas J. Henry and produced by Karma International.

Bootsy Bellows Big Game Pop-Up
Vrsi, 820 Holman St., 9 p.m.

Vrsi will be the spot for another party. This one will be hosted by rapper G-Eazy with Falcons fan Justin Bieber, Patriots fan Kellan Lutz as well as Drake, Katy Perry, Alyssa Milano, Tobey Maguire, and Kendall and Kylie Jenner expected to attend.

Super Saturday Night
Club Nomadic, 2121 Edwards St., 11 p.m.

Chrissy Teigen and Michael Strahan are among those slated to watch Taylor Swift at the DirecTV Now event at Club Nomadic presented by AT&T.

Sunday, Feb. 5

On Location Experiences Pre-Game Party
NRG Center

On Location Experiences is hosting a preparty with performances from Lady Antebellum, O.A.R and Tyler Farr.

In Los Angeles . . .

Sunday, Feb. 5 

The Bungalow Super Bowl Parties
The Bungalow Santa Monica and The Bungalow Huntington Beach, 12 p.m.

The Bungalow’s two outposts in Santa Monica and Huntington Beach will be hosting viewing parties for those not making the trek to Houston. Those looking to party can purchase a table and receive seven “house beers” in Santa Monica. There will also be jalapeno poppers, stadium nachos, cheeseburgers and hot wings cooked up by Chef Yousef Ghalaini. In Huntington Beach there will be fish sliders, Ahi poke nachos and the Bungalow’s famous tacos.

Where are you partying this weekend? Are you hosting your own viewing party? Did you book a trip to Houston? Who are you rooting for on game day? Sound off in the comments section below.

Trump Nominates Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court

President Trump announced Judge Neil M. Gorsuch as his nominee for the Supreme Court on Tuesday in the East Room of the White House. Credit Stephen Crowley/The New York Times

WASHINGTON — President Trump on Tuesday nominated Judge Neil M. Gorsuch, a federal appeals court judge in Denver, to fill the Supreme Court seat left open by the death last year of Justice Antonin Scalia, elevating a jurist whose conservative bent and originalist philosophy fit the mold of the man he would succeed.

Mr. Trump’s announcement, delivered during prime time in the East Room of the White House, marked his first bid to reshape the nation’s highest court, as he had promised so often on the campaign trail.

“Judge Gorsuch has outstanding legal skills, a brilliant mind, tremendous discipline and has earned bipartisan support,” Mr. Trump said, standing beside the judge and his wife, Louise, in the East Room. “It is an extraordinary resume — as good as it gets.”

If confirmed, Judge Gorsuch would restore the 5-to-4 split between liberals and conservatives on the court, handing Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, 80, who votes with both blocs, the swing vote.

At 49, Judge Gorsuch is the youngest nominee to the Supreme Court in 25 years, underscoring his potential to shape major decisions for decades to come. In choosing him, Mr. Trump reached for a reliably conservative figure in the Scalia tradition but not someone known to be divisive.

Judge Gorsuch said he was humbled by his “most solemn assignment” and said he would be “a faithful servant of the Constitution and laws of this great country.” he said.

The president, facing what is likely to be a bitter partisan battle over Judge Gorsuch’s confirmation, expressed hope that he could avoid such a dispute.

_________________________________________________

Where Neil Gorsuch Would Fit on the Supreme Court

Where Trump’s nominee falls on the court’s ideological spectrum.

  

______________________________________________________

“I only hope that both Democrats and Republicans can come together for once, for the good of the country,” Mr. Trump said.

Still, Democrats in the Senate, stung by the Republican refusal to confirm President Barack Obama’s nominee for the seat, Judge Merrick B. Garland, have promised stiff resistance.

The White House had stoked suspense over Mr. Trump’s court choice in the hours before announcing it. A senior Trump administration official said both Judge Gorsuch and Judge Thomas M. Hardiman of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit were summoned to Washington for the nomination ceremony. But only Judge Gorsuch appeared at the ceremony shortly after 8 p.m.

In an allusion to the work he and his team had done to build that suspense, Mr. Trump interrupted his own announcement to marvel at his showmanship. “So what that a surprise?” the president said after announcing Judge Gorsuch’s name. “Was it?”

There had been speculation that Mr. Trump would choose someone with a less elite background for the court. The other finalist for the post, Judge Hardiman, was the first person in his family to graduate from college, and helped pay for his education by driving a taxi.

Judge Gorsuch’s personal connections to Justice Kennedy are no accident. By choosing a familiar figure, several officials said, the White House is sending a reassuring signal to Justice Kennedy, 80, who has been mulling retirement.

Choosing a more ideologically extreme candidate, the officials said, could tempt Justice Kennedy to hang on to his seat for several more years, depriving Mr. Trump of another seat to fill.

Still, Judge Gorsuch’s conservative credentials are not in doubt. He has voted in favor of employers, including Hobby Lobby, who invoked religious objections for refusing to provide some forms of contraception coverage to their female workers. And he has criticized liberals for turning to the courts rather than the legislature to achieve their policy goals.

There had been speculation that Mr. Trump would choose someone with a less elite background for the court. The other finalist for the post, Judge Thomas M. Hardiman, was the first person in his family to graduate from college, and helped pay for his education by driving a taxi.

Judge Gorsuch, on the other hand, is the son of Anne Gorsuch Burford, who became the first female head of the Environmental Protection Agency under President Ronald Reagan. He attended Georgetown Preparatory School, outside Washington, before going to Columbia University.

Democrats, who declined invitations from Mr. Trump to attend the White House announcement ceremony, seemed unlikely to be satisfied with Mr. Trump’s choice. Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the Democratic leader, has said he is ready to block any candidate he sees as outside the mainstream, a stance that could touch off a Senate showdown.

Judge Gorsuch will need to draw the support of eight Democrats to join the 52 Republicans in the Senate to surmount a filibuster and move forward with an up-or-down confirmation vote.

Progressive groups were already planning a rally in front of the court on Tuesday night, anticipating an “extreme” nominee.

“Activists will make clear that the Senate cannot confirm a nominee who will simply be a rubber stamp for President Trump’s anticonstitutional efforts that betray American values,” according to a statement from the organizations, which include People for the American Way, the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and Naral Pro-Choice America.

Conservative groups, too, were planning a major push to defend Mr. Trump’s nominee. Within minutes of the president’s announcement, organizers said, the Judicial Crisis Network was to begin the first phase in a $10 million television advertising campaign on the nominee’s behalf, along with a website promoting Mr. Trump’s pick. More than 50 groups were backing the effort, including gun rights and anti-abortion rights activists and the Tea Party.

♦ Culled from the New York Times

Trump supporters call for Starbucks boycott after pledge to hire 10,000 refugees

Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz.

First came #DeleteUber. Now some consumers are tweeting #BoycottStarbucks.

That new Twitter hashtag was born after Starbucks Chief Executive Howard Schultz said he would hire 10,000 refugees over the next five years in the 75 countries where Starbucks SBUX, -1.22%   operates. “And we will start this effort here in the U.S. by making the initial focus of our hiring efforts on those individuals who have served with U.S. troops as interpreters and support personnel in the various countries where our military has asked for such support,” he said in a statement Sunday. (Starbucks did not immediately reply to request for comment.)

President Donald Trump signed an executive order late Friday that banned the entry of all citizens from seven countries (Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen) with a majority population of Muslims for 90 days, suspended all refugee admissions for 120 days, and stopped all refugees from war-torn Syria indefinitely. After confusion and protests at airports around the country, the Republican-led administration said Sunday that the ban would not impact green-card holders or people with permanent visa status in the U.S.

 Consumers were divided on social media over Schultz’s statement.

Jonathan’s self-inflicted wounds and supervisory blindness – Book chapter

In the very conservative Nigeria’s learning community, celebrating a self-inflicted failure is inconceivable. Why would anybody idolize a loser for doing just about what any loser would do – admit and accept his loss? For goodness sake, why would anyone glorify a leader who erred, lost, gave up, and ran off?

From the book: Governance Buhari’s Way  – The Misapplication of Leadership Praxis (Published April 2016)

By Dr. Anthony O. Ogbo

The mere fact that a sitting President and his first lady could not pass the card-accreditation process they initiated, should indicate that the election was destined for disaster. The incumbent President and presidential candidate of the People’s Democratic Party, Goodluck Ebele Jonathan, and his First Lady, Patience, were declined by the card reader at his home town, Otuoke in Bayelsa State. This caused the whole accreditation process that preceded Nigeria’s 2015 general election to draw mixed reactions.

The crux of the matter was that, Professor Attahiru Jega, to whom President Jonathan entrusted the electoral sector, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), could no longer be trusted with supervision. A thread of events that occurred before a postponement of the initial ballot date clearly revealed that the INEC boss might have been compromised to rig the process in favor of his kinsman. The Professor hails from the North, being the same region as Muhammadu Buhari of the All Progressive Congress (APC) who was Jonathan’s major opposition. As President Jonathan and his wife struggled with accreditation, General Buhari, and his wife, Aisha Buhari, were accredited without any hitch in their home town, Duara, Katsina.

JONATHAN and PDP’s disastrous election outing must not be outlawed as an incorrigible measure; neither must their failure be scorned as disgrace. Rather, the whole process must be recorded as a learning curve – a platform – to reorganize and move on. Nevertheless, to glorify this failure might translate to a scorn of excellence.

President Jonathan, rather unwisely, totally failed to read the handwritings on the wall about Professor Jega’s poor supervision, process unpreparedness, suspicious partisan engagements, lack of transparency, and his boldfaced ability to lie to his country regarding the supervisory readiness of the ballot process. This President failed to learn from the history and reality of his country’s electoral process – that the sitting President reserves the absolute power over the head of the electoral sector, and could remove him for significant reasons. Yet Jega prevailed uninterrupted even when it was obvious that INEC had lost its credibility to deliver ballot fairness or credibility.

Another blunder that wrecked President Jonathan in his quest for a next tenure was the oversight of his campaign team. While the opposition, APC were ceaselessly overrunning the voting population with campaign propaganda, runners of President Jonathan’s campaign were busy scrambling and garnering funds for their personal interests. Does it bother Jonathan that Colonel Sambo Dasuki, his former National Security Adviser allegedly diverted $2.1 billion meant for arms purchase for other unrelated matters? It was alleged that these funds were diverted into President Jonathan’s presidential campaign coffer, but prevalent records show no such connections. Yet it is troubling that these fraudulent activities occurred undetected and unchecked, right under Jonathan’s watch.

In a post-election scrutiny of the current Nigerian political system, it must be noted that both the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) and All Progressive Congress (APC) are still in denial about their roles and flaws in this past general election. Let the truth be told – that President Jonathan and his PDP handlers, unwisely stumbled, while General Buhari and his APC handlers deceitfully usurped victory. PDP claimed Jonathan stepped down out of humility to avoid an anticipated post-election violence, whereas APC branded Buhari a hero who won because Nigerians wanted a change of system. For the records, it must be noted that, letting ‘him’ have ‘yours’ out of ignorance is not humility, it is stupidity. Similarly, victory by deception doesn’t make one a hero, but a rogue. Hence, there were no heroes in Nigeria’s 2015 ballot calamity; neither were there any humble losers. However, there was a confused incumbent, surrounded by selfish handlers, who watched tactlessly while some inglorious rogues absconded with his throne in a typical “daylight snatch-and-grab” assault manner.

After any election, especially in a race as controversial as the PDP-APC presidential polls, a “postmortem” is compulsory. This enables the players explore relevant thoughts about their performances. Winners are engrossed in strategizing about implementing projections, whereas losers evaluate their losses to make amends.

“There were no heroes in Nigeria’s 2015 ballot calamity; neither were there any humble losers. However, there was a confused incumbent, surrounded by selfish handlers, who watched tactlessly while some inglorious rogues absconded with his throne in a typical “daylight snatch-and-grab” assault manner.”

Hence, managing failure remains one of the best part of effective governance. In organizational leadership, failure is not unacceptable. What might be disastrous is when managers fail to immediately assess measures, and reconcile their lapses. However, in the Nigerian system, the situation is ab solutely the opposite. Most winners are immediately occupied with infighting over their opportunities to loot public funds. The others are busy lampooning losers with foul language for losing. Losers on their own part are enthralled in some “don’t blame it on me” mentality.

Even before the presidential inauguration, some losers had already abandoned their political ideologies, “carpet-crossing”, to shower the winning Presidential candidate with congratulatory messages in order to scheme for appointed positions. This is Nigeria – a system where the application of politics as a tool for national development lacks merit. In this system, politics is about resources sharing, geo-political zoning, power-grabbing and treasury looting – all at the expense of the poor and impoverished constituents.

Another devastating part of post-election party politics is a campaign by President Jonathan’s handlers, categorizing him as a martyr and hero for accepting his disgraceful defeat. To make matters worse, President Jonathan absconded after his loss, leaving his party hopeless without leadership. This attitude reveals another side of his temperament; a lack of courage to reorganize his disciples and weather the political storm. Rather than reconvene to access and reconcile a cocktail of mistakes that precipitated and aggravated their failure, the PDP went amok in the social media to glorify a leader who erred, lost, gave up, and ran off.

In the very conservative Nigeria’s learning community, celebrating a self-inflicted failure is inconceivable. Why would anybody idolize a loser for doing just about what any loser would do – admit and accept his loss? For goodness sake, why would anyone glorify a captain who miscalculated, derailed, admitted failure, and abandoned his ship?

In the complex world of organizational leadership, rewarding excellence makes sense because it encourages a culture of hard work, perseverance, and operational efficacy. Rewarding excellent behaviors also create a functioning environment of ethical decency. President Jonathan was a good leader endowed with core transformational competencies that could have moved his country further to inseparable unity if he had triumphed for a second tenure. He must be acknowledged for humbly accepting his loss, but proclaiming him a hero in a race he disgracefully handled and fled, simply sends the wrong message about motivating success and managing excellence.

As stated earlier in this book, failure in transformation management is not a taboo but a challenge that could be managed through identifying and reconciling ambiguities; and resolving them strategically to create a better future. As entrepreneurship scholar, Scott Shane noted, people will not try to do new things if they know that they would be punished for failing. Thus, as a culture, tolerating failure, in fact, makes organizations more innovative and effective. Jonathan and PDP’s disastrous election outing must not be outlawed as an incorrigible measure; neither must their failure be scorned as disgrace. Rather, the whole process must be recorded as a learning curve – a platform – to reorganize and move on. Nevertheless, to glorify this failure might translate to a scorn of excellence.

Dr. Anthony Obi Ogbo, Publisher of International Guardian is the facilitator of The American Journal of Transformational Leadership

♦ THE BOOK This book is not a disqualification of the struggle for one Nigeria, but a scholarly composition about the misapplication of leadership in the executive structure: a paradigmatic appraisal of the Nigerian President, of this ex-dictator’s temperament and his leadership philosophies, and how deceptively and thoughtlessly he might punctuate a hard-fought progress Nigeria has made in attaining a united nation. See BOOK. >>

 

Lawyers Mobilize at Nation’s Airports After Trump’s Order

Lawyers worked with the International Refugee Assistance Project at Kennedy Airport for individuals who were denied entry into the United States. Credit Victor J. Blue for The New York Times

Even before President Trump issued an order on Friday banning immediate entry into the United States by people from several predominantly Muslim countries, immigration lawyers, having heard rumors of coming action from the White House, were on alert.

On Wednesday, lawyers from the International Refugee Assistance Project at the Urban Justice Center who were concerned that the action would affect the project’s clients sent out an email calling for lawyers who could volunteer immediately to go to airports where refugees were scheduled to enter the United States.

“It occurred to us that there were going to be people who were traveling who would land and have their status affected while in midair,” said Betsy Fisher, the group’s policy director.

And that is exactly what happened. Across the country, people were detained on Sunday after being caught up in the aftermath of Mr. Trump’s order, even though a petition filed on Saturday in federal court in Brooklyn led a judge to block part of the order. Hameed Khalid Darweesh and Haider Sameer Abdulkhaleq Alshawi, the plaintiffs named in the petition, were originally clients of Ms. Fisher’s organization.

The email received a tremendous response, Ms. Fisher said, with “well over a thousand people” expressing interest and availability.

Others who heard about the effort through colleagues or the news media went to airports on their own to pitch in. By early Sunday morning, Ms. Fisher said, lawyers offering services and advice were at “most international airports in the United States.”

Andre Segura, a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union, arrived at Kennedy International Airport in New York at 1:30 p.m. on Saturday. He said that the outside section of Central Diner, a restaurant in Terminal 4, was “entirely taken over by attorneys,” all working to file petitions for individual clients with the help of the clients’ families.

“There were attorneys from numerous major law firms, nonprofits, all working together,” Mr. Segura said. “I’ve never seen that immediate coming together of teams to start filing actions to try to protect people.”

He added, “The dynamic between what was happening inside the terminal with all the attorneys, and outside with massive protests and people holding signs — I’ve never experienced anything like that.”

Mr. Segura said he arrived home around 2 a.m. on Sunday. He woke up at 5:30 and began answering emails from lawyers who had stayed overnight at the airport.

While lawyers gathered at airports on Saturday, others were working furiously on litigation. Cecillia Wang, the A.C.L.U.’s deputy legal director, described the scene at her office as “complete chaos.”

“I was sitting at my desk working on a template habeas petition that could be used by lawyers at airports all around the country,” she said.

“That was not something we had on the shelf ready to go, waiting for the right plaintiffs to come along,” he said. “It was a case of: There’s this emergency, and people have to work together to figure out a response as quickly as we can so that these people and other people around the country didn’t get deported.”

Even after word of the federal court’s order reached the airport in New York, confusion reigned.

Alina Das, a professor of clinical law at New York University School of Law, said she had arrived at the airport at 7 p.m. on Saturday and stayed overnight, working to get a client released. Ms. Das, who said she could not comment on her client’s situation, described the scene on Sunday morning, saying that it was “incredibly difficult to get an answer on whether our clients were going to be sent back or whether they were being processed for release” and that people remained detained even after the court order blocked part of the president’s actions.

Avi Gesser, a partner at the law firm Davis Polk & Wardwell, described the process in Terminal 4 on Saturday, saying that a group of people had been deployed to search for those whose family members were detained.

“If they found people, they referred them over to us and we onboarded people as clients if we could, and then filed habeas petitions,” he said.

Mr. Gesser, who is originally from Canada, did not leave the airport until 4:30 a.m. on Sunday, he said.

“Our firm has a lot of people who were not born in the United States,” he said. “We felt that people who were being detained needed legal representation. And that’s something that we do very well.”

Rebecca Heller, who was coordinating lawyers’ efforts on the ground for the International Refugee Assistance Project on Saturday, said that by Sunday afternoon, her services were far less in demand.

“They’re self-organizing now!” she said excitedly in a brief phone call. “That’s how a movement starts.”

Four federal judges file orders opposing parts of President Trump’s travel bans

Protests erupted at JFK Airport in New York after passengers were detained there.

Federal judges on Sunday piled on opposition to President Trump’s travel bans, following an order from a Brooklyn judge that began the legal backlash to his executive orders.

Judges in Massachusetts, Virginia and Washington State signed orders halting parts of Trump’s executive orders, which brought chaos and protests to airports nationwide as authorities suddenly cracked down on passengers banned by the President’s broad rules.

In Massachusetts, U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs and Magistrate Judge Judith Dein issued a seven-day ban on federal officials deporting and even detaining passengers targeted by the orders.

Travelers flying into Boston’s Logan Airport  “will not be detained or returned based soley on the basis of the Executive Order,” the judges wrote.

In Virginia, U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema also handed down a seven-day ban on deportations, and ordered federal officials to give lawyers access to “all legal permanent residents” who are detained at Dulles International Airport in Washington, D.C.

Meanwhile, U.S. District Judge Thomas Zilly in Washington granted an emergency stay to two unnamed individuals and set a Feb. 3 court hearing to determine their future.

The legal tumult started Saturday night after U.S. District Judge Ann Donnelly, in Brooklyn, granted a nationwide emergency stay for travelers trapped by the bans. At least 17 passengers were detained at JFK Airport on Saturday, and about 5,000 protesters swarmed the airport calling for their release.

On Sunday, 16 Democratic state attorney generals also issued a joint statement vowing to fight Trump’s order. The statement said the prosecutors were “confident that the Executive Order will ultimately be struck down by the courts.”

Woman set for deportation attempts suicide at JFK

The Department of Homeland Security said in a statement it will “continue to enforce all of President Trump’s Executive Orders in a manner that ensures the safety and security of the American people.”

But the same statement said the agency would “comply with judicial orders” and “faithfully enforce our immigration laws.”

DHS also said the detained travelers — some of whom were held for up to 18 hours — were merely “inconvenienced while enhanced security measures were implemented.”

“President Trump’s Executive Order affects a minor portion of international travelers, and is a first step towards reestablishing control over America’s borders and national security,” the statement said.

DHS has not released an official tally of how many travelers have been detained since Trump signed his order Friday.

Trump’s executive order brought a 120-day suspension to America’s refugee program, and an indefinite end to its intake of Syrian refugees. It also blocked all people from Syria, Iraq, Iran, Sudan, Somalia, Libya, and Yemen — including green card residents — from entering the United States for 90 days.

Starbucks Responds to Trump Immigration Order With Pledge to Hire 10,000 Refugees

In a direct response to President Donald Trump’s executive order banning travel from seven Muslim-majority countries, Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz announced the company will hire 10,000 refugees in the 75 countries where it does business, with the effort starting in the United States.

“We are living in an unprecedented time, one in which we are witness to the conscience of our country, and the promise of the American dream, being called into question,” Schultz wrote in a company-wide memo on Sunday. “These uncertain times call for different measures and communication tools than we have used in the past.”

“There are more than 65 million citizens of the world recognized as refugees by the United Nations, and we are developing plan to hire 10,000 of them over five years in the 75 countries around the world where Starbucks does business,” he continued.

According to the announcement, the refugee hiring plan will start with an initial focus on “those individuals who have served with US troops as interpreters and support personnel.” The letter also denounced some of the president’s other controversial policies, including his plan to build a wall along the US-Mexico border and efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act.

The letter on Sunday adds Schultz to a growing list of business executives who have publicly criticized Trump’s immigration order since it was signed on Friday. While the hiring proposal was largely met with praise, some have taken to social media to protest Starbucks.

Bombshell Revelation: how a Nigerian Governor, Ifeanyi Okowa lost stolen $10m funds to a US mistress

According to the report, the governor (pictured) resorted to using his US-based mistress to stash the funds abroad to avoid detection by security agencies. The cash was allegedly either wired or hauled in tranches in order to beat the nation’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU).

By Elsie Halima Ijorogu-Reed

Investigations by Drumbeat News reveal that the Delta State governor, Ifeanyi Okowa has lost the state’s 10 Million Dollars to his mistress in the United States of America.

An impeccable source in Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) who confirmed our report disclosed that the anti-graft agency has commenced investigation into Okowa’s $10 million, which  he may have diverted from the bailout funds allocated to his State, but  was hijacked by his America-based mistress. Okowa, it was gathered, had commissioned his mistress to help him launder the money to a slush accounts  he provided. But instead, the lady deposited  the money into her own account in the United States, we reliably learnt. It was also gathered that the money in question has been traced, according to a report by The Nation Newspaper who deliberately withheld Okowa’s name.

According to the report, the governor resorted to using his US-based mistress to stash the funds abroad to avoid a trail by security agencies. The cash was allegedly, either wired or hauled in tranches, in order to beat the nation’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU). In spite of the Okowa’s unethical conduct, security agencies were able to intercept the deal between him and his mistress.

We learnt that the diversion of the looted $10 million by the mistress created an uproar and  triggered the ongoing investigation over their love affair. One of the sources involved in the probe confirmed that,  “Delta state governor is in soup and under probe by some security agencies. “

Governor  Okowa seems to have been duped by his mistress in Texas, another source confirmed, saying,  “The governor is worried after discovering that his girlfriend has defrauded him of $10 million”

Flashback about a State in recession, 2015: Governor of Delta State, Ifeanyi Okowa, giving his Speech before Rt. Hon. Monday Igboya, Speaker, Delta State House of Assembly, during the briefing to Delta State House of Assembly, on Financial Status of the State.

“What started as a love affair and promises of good faith has turned sour. Yet the governor would not want his wife or the people of the state, who would be disappointed, to know about this ugly transaction,” the source confided.

The security chief added: “Investigation so far indicated that the governor allegedly diverted part of the bailout funds meant for his state to the mistress. Very soon, the details of the transaction will be revealed to Nigerians. This is why the government has decided to monitor how bailout funds and London-Paris loan refunds were spent.”

The Presidency in 2016 released the sum of N1. 266.44 trillion to 36 states within nine months.

All efforts to get Gov. Okowa or his office to respond have been unsuccessful, as they  neither  picked calls nor responded to text messages. When our correspondent tried to contact his principal secretary, Hilary Ibegbulem, his aide informed us that he took his sick father to London for treatment.

♦ Culled from The Drumbeat News

x Close

Like Us On Facebook